October 05, 2004

One Human Family

I have found that the best time for me to write anything logically coherent is when someone has, to some degree, pissed me off. It never fails - say some inane comment and I’m off - gears grinding and arguments flying.

In my head, at least. I rarely let it pass beyond my lips, merely because of one too many experiences where my foot had inadvertently ended up in my mouth.

Such was the case this evening, as I pondered the perplexity of writing a paper for my women's study class. I had dropped my husband off to Theatre rehearsal and was embarking for the bus ride to the library when who should appear but a few of Nathan’s classmates and the director of the Theatre department himself.

After the usual polite and banty excange, I was asked where I was headed. Remarking that I had a paper to write, that it was on the topic of women studies, and that I was thinking writing about [images of] black women [in literature], the director said, and quite assuredly, I might add, “Well, they are different from white women.”

Of course, this was not what I had in mind when I began! My mind was off at once, thinking of a retort such as, "in what way do you mean?" Or, "in what context?"

Of course there is difference between white women and black women! But, even more strikingly, there is more diversity between black women than there is between white women and black women! A lecture on Anthropology I attended last week presented information that showed that the genetic diversity in the continent of Africa was greater than the diversity between a "white" European and a "black" African!

AND RACE IS ONLY SKIN DEEP! Human diversity exists, but to classify it as we do by skin colour is just plain silly!

Seeing that all of this information just wouldn’t do, and scrambling to make some sense of a speedily derailing conversation, I added, “Of course, we both have breasts!”

(At this point, as I'm sure you can ascertain, dear reader, my hackles were slightly roused, since it is imperative that I get across to all who cross my path that there is only one human family, for heavens’ sake.)

And at this point, which was the vilest turn of all, the male student pointed his finger at me and said,

“Actually, [you] don’t both have breasts – white women’s are called 'durgs(?),'” to which he added,

“Look it up.”

Shocked, I finished the conversation as quickly as possible and stumbled a retreat.

First of all, who areyou to tell me (a woman) that not all women have breasts, and furthermore, as you perceive that I could be a white woman, who are you to tell me what I have?

Of course, I can't be TOO upset at this individual (yes, actuially I can, but I won't be) since he didn't invent the information but rather was simply repeating what he had "learned."

The issue is that someone (and I bet it wasn't a woman, white, black, or any other color) decided that it was important in the name of science to give a label to the breasts of white women, thus differentiating their breasts (which are anatomically basically the same as everyone else's breasts, except men's - but even then!) from the breasts of anyone who isn't white.

This is an all too-typical scenario – an overstuffed white male, in the interest of “science” and “knowledge” informing me about my body. And informing me of a STUPID and BANAL term coined by someone who didn’t own any in the first place!

This inane term was pulled out of th air by someone at a point in our history where everything had to be dissected and neatly classified.

Named and then conquered.

Oh lord – the remnants glare us in the face even today.

I must say, that over a half an hour of looking up the term, or what I heard to be the term, I feel almost defeated.

I am sorry if any of this ranting has offended you - I admit I am reacting out of pain. I look for the day when everyone's breasts are recognised as unique and beautiful, and the women behind the breasts are valued for their contribution to society rather than the colour of their skin!

Love,

~liz

Posted by lizington at October 5, 2004 08:31 PM
Comments

Interesting. When I read this and the other comments, I thought of that line in Anchorman when Ron Burgondy says, "It's science!" However, not only is there biological "proof" available for consumption, there is fifty thousand times more religious "proof" that is fed to millions of people. Just in Christianity, the story of Adam and Eve has inspired so many distortions of the dynamic between men and women, if a characteristic dynamic could even be said to exist. Perhaps a driving force behind the creation of these perposterous "scientific" facts was to allow two seemingly contradictory schools of thought (ie science and religion) to agree. Ironic, isn't it? I really think the only way to halt the ignorance is to end the religious foundations that preach inequality.

But what do I know? Apparently, my kind (kind as in the sense of a category of people who share similar characteristics imposed by society, not kind as in male; the two just happen to be the same in this instance) don't have much credence on this issue...

Posted by: nathan at October 6, 2004 11:25 AM

Okay, maybe I'm just being the devil's advocate here, but does this mean that when women & men are equal that men won't be so stupid anymore?

It's so easy to make sweeping generalities (like the one I just made) about men when we encounter individuals who are so ... arrogantly stupid. I, and so many women I know, seem to have this issue (as Liz & Amy's statements attest) - men presenting some sort of "information", and because we don't have a page number to quote back at them our thoughts are irrelevant and we are left with a burning fury akin to unadulterated hatred. Not to mention resentment, feelings of disempowerment, etc. Clearly, these feelings remain for some time. Do these men know what they're doing to us? What do we do about it? What do we do with this phenomenon? Other than kicking them out of the gene pool...

Posted by: Mara at October 6, 2004 09:56 AM

This whole ugly scene reminds me of the time when a supposed friend -- a college-educated white male -- told me (with maddening certainty) that there were only 3 days out of a woman's monthly cycle when she could get pregnant; therefore, any woman who became pregnant did so by choice and was undeserving of sympathy or assistance. Just thinking of it makes me shake with fury. Not to mention the fact that it absolves the male involved of any responsibility whatever. "She got pregnant." I always want to say: "She did? Really? All by herself?" It's yet another example of how the inequality of men and women is holding back the whole human family. Everybody take a deep breath and say: Mankind is ONE!

Posted by: Amy Eades at October 5, 2004 11:42 PM
Post a comment











(Spam prevention during sabbatical - ask Liz for the password)

Remember personal info?